Posts Tagged ‘Americas’

mtDNA in human coprolites in Oregon

Saturday, April 5th, 2008

Even though the Clovis First theory got smashed to bits years ago, every time there is a press release about anything dating before Clovis in the Americas, it’s the very first time all over again to the media. Nonetheless, the Oregon coprolites dating to 14,300 years ago is a welcome addition to the evidence against Clovis First… blah, blah, blah… Clovis wasn’t first. Get over it.

What’s cool about this story is the mitochondrial DNA being extracted from the coprolites (as well as examples of the diet of these people) and it is along the Pacific migration route. The abstract of the paper, DNA from Pre-Clovis Human Coprolites in Oregon, North America, states the mtDNA is from haplogroups A2 and B2.  The presence B haplogroup makes me wonder if that haplogroup primarily came to the Americas by the coastal route, and not overland through Canada, but it would be presumptuous and wrong for me to chime in too much more on that, as i don’t know much more than what has been absorbed from some popular science readings. Wild speculation is fun.

using obsidian’s origin to track human migration in Pacific Northwest

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

This practice of studying movement of tribes by where their obsidian came from seems cool to me. Obsidian is identifiable by its volcano of origins. The migration of north to south versus west and east is almost too obvious, as that’s the way that the mountain ranges run, but it’s obviously better than asserting with less evidence. I was hoping more about trade routes would be uncovered, but until obsidian from areas further away is tested, that won’t become clear:

A long time ago – a very long time ago – obsidian was all the rage. Abundant in Oregon and relatively easy to craft, Native American cultures used the volcanic rock to make prehistoric tools: knives, spear tips and the like.

“They’re razor sharp, sharper than any steel could be ground,” said Dennis L. Jenkins, Ph.D., senior staff archaeologist at the University of Oregon, who presented Friday at Tamastslikt Cultural Institute.

In his lecture, entitled “Obsidian: History Through the Volcanic Glass Window,” Jenkins touched on the wealth of information contained in the rock artifacts found all over the state, and how archaeologists can trace the movement of those artifacts from their original source.

“There will be these rare minerals in there that can be chemically identified, and they are unique to each volcano,” Jenkins said.

By a special X-ray procedure archaeologists can match the mineral composition to a specific volcanic source in the Western United States.

“And that allows us to track each individual artifact back to the exact location where it came from,” he said. “And it’s not uncommon in a particular site to find up to 30 or 40 obsidian sources represented there.”

Furthermore, archaeologists can trace the movement of obsidian artifacts by a fairly simple process. Whereas ancient peoples who crafted the tools would begin with large, often fist-sized cores, they would break them down, leaving millions of tiny flake pieces at the source location.

But the tools themselves would get smaller and smaller through time as their owners traveled and sharpened them, leaving further trails of flakes. Thus, as a general rule, Jenkins said the smaller the artifact, the farther it is from the original source.

“They were leaving a trail of evidence behind them,” he said.

For figuring out the age of the artifacts, Jenkins described multiple dating techniques, including a process called obsidian hydration.

As obsidian naturally absorbs water from the atmosphere, archaeologists can measure the amount of absorption and determine the time it took to occur. They first, however, must calibrate that measurement to the average soil temperature of the location where it was found.

Alternately, through a method called seriation, archaeologists sometimes can guess the general date of an obsidian tool based on its appearance.

“Technology improved through time,” Jenkins said, showing slides of increasingly sophisticated tools.

While ancient hunters may have begun by crafting relatively oval-shaped tools around 13,500 years ago, by about 2,000 years ago they were able to make extremely swift-moving arrow points.

Jenkins concluded by demonstrating the results of a study he helped conduct, examining the source and age of about 5,600 obsidian artifacts in Oregon. What he found were a few general pattern areas in which obsidian artifacts traveled with their owners north and south, with little east to west movement from the source. Jenkins presented a few ideas for that pattern, saying valleys more or less corresponded with the boundaries.

“Maybe this is a product of just normal movement through the environment on a north-south access,” Jenkins said.

Also, as old storm patterns would have moved west to east, the ancient cultures may have migrated north and south, carrying their resources along the way.

Caral now dated as oldest urban site in Americas

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

Or not. Looking at that story about Patiti, this claim could be refuted in a month or two, but the research seems far more solid here.

The Caral site in Peru has been dated at 3,500 BC,  contemporaneous with urban sites in Mesopotamia and Egypt (and India too, i reckon.) Here’s the AP article:

LIMA, Peru (AP) — A team of German and Peruvian archaeologists say they have discovered the oldest known monument in Peru: a 5,500-year-old ceremonial plaza near Peru’s north-central coast.

Carbon dating of material from the site revealed it was built between 3500 B.C. and 3000 B.C., Peter Fuchs, a German archaeologist who headed the excavation team, told The Associated Press by telephone Monday.

The discovery is further evidence that civilization thrived in Peru at the same time as it did in what is now the Middle East and South Asia, said Ruth Shady, a prominent Peruvian archaeologist who led the team that discovered the ancient city of Caral in 2001. Shady serves as a senior adviser to Peru’s National Culture Institute and was not involved in the project.

The find also raises questions about what prompted “civilizations to form throughout the planet at more or less the same time,” Shady said.

The circular, sunken plaza, built of stones and adobe, is part of the Sechin Bajo archaeological complex in Andes foothills, 206 miles northwest of Lima, where Fuchs and fellow German archaeologist Renate Patzschke have been working since 1992.

It predates similar monuments and plazas found in Caral, which nonetheless remains the oldest known city in the Americas dating back to 2627 B.C.

The plaza served as a social and ritual space where ancient peoples celebrated their “thoughts about the world, their place within it, and images of their world and themselves,” Fuchs said.

In an adjacent structure, built around 1800 B.C., Fuchs’ team uncovered a 3,600-year-old adobe frieze — six feet tall — depicting the iconic image of a human sacrificer “standing with open arms, holding a ritual knife in one hand and a human head in the other,” Fuchs said.

The mythic image was also found in the celebrated Moche Lords of Sipan tombs, discovered on Peru’s northern coast in the late 1980s.

Walter Alva, the Peruvian archaeologist who uncovered the Lords of Sipan tombs, said the plaza found in Fuchs’ dig was probably utilized by an advanced civilization with economic stability, a necessary condition to construct such a ceremonial site.

The excavation was the fourth in a series of digs at the Sechin Bajo complex that Fuchs and Patzschke began on behalf of the University of Berlin in 1992. Deutsche Forschung Gemeinschaft, a German state agency created to sponsor scientific investigations, has financed the most recent three digs.

The find “shows the world that in America too, human beings of the New World had the same capacity to create civilization as those in the Old World,” Shady said.

Her discovery, Caral, made headlines in 2001 when researchers carbon-dated material from the city back to 2627 B.C., proving that a complex urban center in the Americas thrived as a contemporary to ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt — 1,500 years earlier than previously believed.

It’s rather interesting that this early urban site is in South America, but nothing analogous has turned up in North America. Were the remnants of early civilization destroyed so thoroughly in European colonization? Yeah, probably… It seems a little odd that humans would have colonized both continents, yet first became urbanized much further geographically from where they appeared. Then again, it might not just be about the European colonization, but subsequent waves from Asia that disrupted the established cultures in North america.