Yesterday, our resident sociopath in the bookstore came back in trumpeting that J.K. Rowlings is a plagiarist, and every dime of her money should go to the person who actually wrote the “Larry Potter” book. He’s delighted when something awful happens, and develops an “I told you so” attitude even if it’s something that has never crossed his fevered mind before in his life. Now, in his hateful brain, Rowlings is a thief, and she must be punished. He came into work earlier this week mumbling something about it, but when asked where the info came from, and he didn’t know, it was easy to dismiss him. Last night he revealed that the story is on the ABC news site. It actually affected my mood last night, as i love Harry Potter, and would be devastated to find that she stole every word from another forgotten book. Checking the story this morning, there’s no story. The name “Larry Potter” is close, the physical description is vaguely similiar, and the word “Muggles” describing a group of people is a real similarity. However, the plot is different, and “Muggles” means something completely different. If you visit the other author’s site, it’s easy to see that there’s no chance that Rowling stole the entire story arc of Harry Potter. Those three things are the only real hooks that Stouffer has, and our bookstore sociopath made up the rest last night. Check CNN. You will not see this story. It’s only on ABCnews, which is related to Disney. Making a lot more sense now? I thought so.
I finished those new Harry Potter books the day that I got them, in case i forgot to mention that, which is probably the case. The real problem is still that they are too short. The book on monsters is more disappointing for me, as i need more monster. I am the sort that was used to pouring through the old myths, and then getting excited with the Monster Manuals (and Fiend Folio) when playing AD&D, and when all of those monsters lost their newness, waiting for each new issue of Dragon magazine, hoping that there were some entries of reader submitted monsters. I actually like Rowling’s monster better, as they are not about hit point and armor class, but where they live and how they behave and antecdotes of encounters with them. I know that there’s more monsters and fantastic beasts in Harry’s world than are in this book, but while they are hinted in the introduction, we need more! As for the Quidditch book, because of less expectations, it was more interesting. Also, it’s quite probable that more of Quidditch is straight out of Rowling’s head (not Stouffer! HA!) as we have certain expectations of how dragons and faeries behave. The books should be used as primary evidence in any court case defending Rowling’s inventiveness.
It’s nice to see that another undiscovered fossil hominid has been discovered. It’s a contemporary of everyone’s favorite ancestor Lucy, and it has scientists questioning whether Lucy was an ancestor at all, as this new hominid is another species altogether. I’m not convinced either hominid is a direct human ancestor anyway. There’s quite possibly undiscovered hominids stomping aroudn the rain forests and mountaintops of the world, considering the Sasquatch and the Yeti. I saw a television show the other night that was trashing the Patterson Bigfoot film, and dismissing the Yeti, but revealing some other crypto-ape that I’ve already lost the name of, down in Malaya. the orang something-or-the-other, that seems to be about three feet tall and a true biped. Forget that I said any of that. They are doing some great, open-minded science in Kenya, and I’m eager to hear more about it.
There was a thread going on the Elephant 6 listserv about favorite psych bands, and I’ve stayed out so far. I hate to post on there, with my penchant for needlessly slandering NMH, but even though I’ve been not been in a psych mood for quite awhile, I still love the genre. One guy posted in his 20 bands in his Top Ten (yeah, i understand and empathize with his math actually) that Walter Ghoul’s Lavender Brigade is one on his favorites (with the rest being winners too, like Tomorrow, the UK Kaleidoscope, Os Mutantes, and the Pretty Things.) That weirded me out, as the only other contemporary band in his list was the Olivia Tremor Control, and Walter Ghoul’s Lavender Brigade is not exactly a household name, even in the indie community. Not to be pessimistic, but i thought that I had a rough headcount on most of the fans. Not only does he appreciate WGLB, but this guy seems to have a pretty cool psych project too, the Orange Alabaster Mushroom. I’ve downloaded the two tracks from MP3.com and their damned good. Very retro and traditional, but damn it, i like a good psych-pop song. (So far, “Space-Time” is my favorite of the two, by a hair’s breadth.)
That also brings to mind that I can see why Greenberger and AMG liked Young Fresh Fellows better than the Minus 5 effort. After what i wrote Thursday night, I instantly figured out what they were talking about. Beyond having clever songs that sound cool, and are played well (not to mention an all-star line-up. I had no clue that Peter Buck roped Robyn Hitchcock into the Minus 5 project,) the Young Fresh Fellows album has a life and vigor that seems missing from the Minus 5. I doubt if it has so much as the style of the music as the fact that the people involved in the Minus 5 are just spread too thin with other projects. It’s the triple line-up of the joyous Boyce and Hart cover, Gary Numan cover that threw me for a loop, and the total garage toss-off of “My Drum Set” that won me over, as it really does sound like a battle of the bands dart toss.
Whatever the music, the Young Fresh Fellows deserve some smiles for the clver asides in their liner notes. At least they entertained me.
Salon has Arianna Huffington hinting that McCain should abandon the Republican party, and go to the peopel with his notions of campaign finance reform. It makes me sick to think that both of the Louisiana Democratic senators are throwing their lot in with the old money. Salon even rates them in the bottom 10% in performance. I had some small hopes for Landrieu, even though it’s obvious that Breaux is evil. Both must get booted from office now. Unfortunately, the
Of all places, the terminally boring Hammond Daily Star had a cool op-ed piece from a retired professor, Roman Heleniak, who pointed out that as much as Shrub and his allies whien and shake their heads about the unfair burden the wealthy must pay in taxes, a graduated income tax is how it was defined in the Constitution, under Amendment XVI. Then again, since Shrub’s handlers have the Supreme Court in their pocket, it’s not inconceivable that the Supreme court might find that Amendment unconstitutional and discard it. After all, they are insisting that the “Framers” were not serious about their declarations of church and state. To the “conservatives”, it is clear that they meant any church other than Christian Protestant. the rest of the piece compared Shrub to Warren G. Harding and Calvin Coolidge. Hee hee.